Previous Entry | Next Entry

Calorie Overload

  • Mar. 8th, 2007 at 2:41 PM
bento
There's a thread on the SparkPeople site about a TLC show which I neglected to watch last night. It's about people who eat 33,000+ calories in a day. A day. One woman on the thread calculated that to be about 60 Big Macs or about 30 pints of Ben & Jerry's ice cream. I thought I would put together my own listing of how to eat 33,000 calories in a day.

  • 1 Pizza Hut 14" Cheese Pizza, Thick Crust - 2943
  • Denny's chocolate peanut butter pie (assuming 6 pieces per pie) - 3918
  • Baskin Robbins Kissable Sundae - 980
  • Baskin Robbins Nuts About Chocolate Sundae - 1350
  • Baskin Robbins Banana Split - 1030
  • PF Chang's Vegetarian Lettuce Wraps + Pan Fried Vegetable Dumplings + Coconut Curry Vegetables + White Rice + Great Wall of Chocolate - 4130
  • Dorito's Nacho Cheese Tortilla Chips (13oz bag) - 1820
  • Almond Joy - 220
  • Reese's peanut butter cups - 280
  • Starbucks Large Banana Mocha Frappuccino, no whip + Maple Coffee Cake Muffin - 1340
  • Jamba Juice Large Peanut Butter Moo'd drink - 1170
  • Olive Garden Fettuccine Alfredo + Bruschetta - 1051
  • Ruby Tuesday Spinach Artichoke Dip + Veggie Burger + Baked Potato w/butter & sour cream + French Fries + Blondie - 2770
  • IHOP Banana Nut Pancakes w/banana syrup & butter + Garden Scramble = 1637
  • Bob Evans Home Fries + Roasted Caramel Apple Cream Stacked & Stuffed Hotcakes + Grits + Garden Harvest Omelet + Three Cheese Omelet + Grilled Cheese Sandwich + Frosted Cinnamon Swirl Roll + Biscuit - 4423
  • Taco Bell 7-Layer Burrito + Cheese Quesadilla + Nachos BellGrande (no meat) + Cinnamon Twists - 1830
  • Regular Coca-Cola, 2 Liters - 824
  • Regular Barq's Root Beer, 2 Liters - 944
  • Total - 33,380 calories in one day
Overwhelming, isn't it? I can't imagine eating that much each day. If I ate that much in a day, I wouldn't eat anything more for two weeks at a minimum. I will have to try to catch that show if it re-airs.

Comments

[info]filkerdave wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 07:53 pm (UTC)
Jeez...I'm overfull just READING that list.
[info]aleja wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 07:56 pm (UTC)
I couldn't even eat the whole first thing on the list.
[info]gomer43 wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 08:08 pm (UTC)
I wonder if this is related to the people who eat that much to gain as much weight as possible. They think they're sexy that way. I saw some show on these people a few years ago. I was wondering why they thought they were going to live more than a few years doing this.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 08:12 pm (UTC)
That's the feeder/gainer phenomenon. It's actually usually a co-dependent thing. Wikipedia is a good place to start for basic info on feederism.
[info]trunkbutt wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 08:10 pm (UTC)
ooh, yucky!
[info]clayfoot wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 08:58 pm (UTC)
Maybe if they lived somewhere really, really cold, and just burned up the calories working outside? It's a stretch, but I'm looking for some way this could work.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 08:59 pm (UTC)
Oh, no - sorry I didn't mention that. These people are all horribly morbidly obese, the lightest was 365 pounds. They were bedridden for the most part. (I missed the show itself but there's been discussion on that thread I mentioned.)
[info]clayfoot wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 09:09 pm (UTC)
Oh, dear. That's hard to imagine. All of them must be nearly confined to home by now.
[info]cocobuttr wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 09:43 pm (UTC)
I was looking at Lin's general biology textbook last night, and in the study section at the end of one of the chapters, it talked about eating disorders. This thing claimed that some bulimics eat as much as 50,000 kCal in a SITTING. I don't mean to be argumentative, but I really don't think that's physically possible. All that food would take up more volume than the entire person, let alone just the person's digestive tract. Cripes.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 09:50 pm (UTC)
I would agree with you there. Unless they consider someone purging multiple times mid-meal to be having "one sitting" then it just shouldn't be possible. And even then, that sitting would have to be many hours long - it takes time to eat so much.
[info]ammre wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 10:04 pm (UTC)
Some call this stalking... I call this, you finding a whole bunch of really cool websites... I just joined spark, hah, let's see if this helps.
[info]sunnydale47 wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 11:11 pm (UTC)
When I was in my early 20s I got a 5-pound Whitman's sampler for some occasion. (I don't remember why.) I was leaving on a road trip, so I took it with me.

You know those studies that tell you that you eat more when you are taking from a large bowl or box than from a small one? They're right. I couldn't wait to open the box, so I sat in the passenger seat of the car and ate a few chocolates. Mmmm! But the box still looked completely full, so I obviously hadn't had very many -- so I ate a few more.

I think subconsciously I was expecting it to look like a 1-pound box of chocolates does when I've eaten a few. So I ate another few pieces. But I still wasn't getting the visual cue I was apparently expecting, so I ate a few more.

I don't remember how much I ended up eating during the course of an hour or so, nibbling more and more, but it was a lot. After awhile I started feeling a little off, and eventually I felt really sick to my stomach. I think it was all that fat and sugar on an empty stomach.

I certainly never intended to eat so much candy all at once! It was so insidious ... I never realized how much I was actually eating until it was too late and I felt horrible. It didn't put me off eating chocolates (unfortunately), but I've always remembered that incident and have been more careful!

Aside from the long-term damage to their bodies, I don't know how those people do it without feeling sick. I guess their bodies are used to it -- mine certainly wasn't!
[info]etoilepb wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 11:30 pm (UTC)
I suppose that on Thanksgiving Day, where I always eat myself sick, and where I sometimes treat myself to donuts for breakfast before cooking, I MIGHT be able to eat 30,000 calories' worth of food and drink. MIGHT. It's probably nowhere near that high, though.

Good lord. When I'm eating like a pig, instead of watching what I eat, I probably average 3000-4000 calories per day. I can't imagine eating & drinking ten times that much.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 8th, 2007 11:34 pm (UTC)
If you ate this 15-pound WHOLE turkey, you'd get about 8400 calories. So another yardstick is that these people are eating the equivalent of about four WHOLE turkeys per day. Yikes.
[info]raisinbottom wrote:
Mar. 9th, 2007 12:49 am (UTC)
Okay this thread delivers but honestly I would like to recommend to anyone reading that they should support locally owned establishments rather than chains.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 9th, 2007 01:06 am (UTC)
Actually, I agree with you 100%. We have local Chinese, Italian (incl. pizza), and ice cream places. Even local diners/breakfast places. If I were going to eat 33,000 calories a day, I'd definitely contribute. But I was looking for the nutritional info online, and the chains were what I found, so.
[info]oh_chris wrote:
Mar. 9th, 2007 03:24 am (UTC)
i'm impressed that you managed to keep it all vegetarian.
[info]woofiegrrl wrote:
Mar. 9th, 2007 01:23 pm (UTC)
Hee, that was the point! I had to keep it to stuff that I personally would eat. :)

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow